Loading consolidated registers and recipes...
Error loading progress database. Ensure that docs/dashboard_data.json is compiled and generated correctly.
Evidence Quality Signal Live counts from the Evidence Register — full review in the QA / QC Flags tab ▶ Open QA / QC Flags tab
Global Nature-based Solutions Comparison High-level evidence metrics compiled across all active NbS recipes
| Nature-based Solution | Total Sources | Swept / Ingested | Evidence Claims | T4 Suitability Mappings | T3 Climate Hazard Links | T6 Scorecard Outcomes & Costing |
|---|
▼ Suitability Families & Methodology Progress Matrix
Click to collapse/expand| NbS / Suitability Family Variant | T4 Suitability Mappings | Evidence Claims | T3 Climate Hazard Links | T6 Scorecard Outcomes & Costing | Status |
|---|
Filter Overview Scope
Select a Nature-based Solution or sub-practice family to filter the statistics and flow diagram.
Evidence Sourcing & Translation Flow Diagram Hover over nodes to trace lineage, or switch to the Reviewed Sources Grid view.
| Reviewed Source | Tier | Geography / Context | T4 Suitability | T3 Hazards | T6 Costing | Variables Extracted |
|---|
Sources Extraction Status per NbS
Evidence Benchmark Tiers
Represented Study Countries / Contexts
Literature Sourcing Methods
Family Title
Product typeFamily definition details.
Dominant Limiting Factor
Limiting factor description.
Grouping Rationale
Rationale text.
▼ T4 Suitability Variable Mappings
Click to collapse/expand| Variable | Dimension | Default Weight | Standard Dataset | Response Function / Params | Evidence Reconciliation & Justification | Action |
|---|
▼ Verbatim Evidence Claims
▼ T3 Climate Hazard Mitigation Links
Click to collapse/expand| Hazard | Farming Context | Mitigation Potential | Mechanism & Evidence | Action |
|---|
▼ T6 Scorecard Outcomes & Costing
Click to collapse/expand| Outcome / Cost Indicator | Value range | Confidence | Mechanism & Evidence | Action |
|---|
▼ VONT Variable Ontology Register
Click to collapse/expand| Variable ID | Label | Group | Canonical Unit | Min meaningful resolution | Sensitivity |
|---|
▼ T1 Spatial Dataset Registry
Click to collapse/expand| Dataset ID | Dataset Name | Coverage | Format | Access Type / asset ID | Limitations |
|---|
Evidence & Methodology Network Diagram Force-directed relational network showing how literature sources translate to biophysical variables, suitability families, and target recipe tables.
Filter Settings
Hover over any node to highlight its connected neighborhood. Drag nodes to explore relationships. Use mouse scroll to Zoom and Pan. Double-click to pin/unpin nodes.
Node Inspector
Hover or select a node in the network to inspect its metadata, details, and verbatim literature claims.
⚐ QA / QC — VERIFY-FLAG review Every EV row flagged by the relationship-verify pass — work through these before any threshold is trusted
review.py apply.
Reason codes — what each means
ⓘ how the filters work
📚 Stocktake & Tools
Catalogues of what's out there: Peer-reviewed = 220 sources from the pre-repo OpenAlex search (C/I/D benchmark); Tools / methods = the in-repo TOOL_tool_registry (codebases · platforms · method frameworks). In-repo paper-first / grey sweeps live under Discovery & Search Log.
Discovery & Search Log PRISMA-lite funnels, AGROVOC search queries, and borderline edge-case triage decisions.
▼ Evidence Discovery Coverage Audit Matrix
Click to collapse/expandℹ️ What this matrix shows & how to use it — click to expand
What it is. A coverage map of evidence discovery — how far the pipeline has progressed for every combination of sub-practice, recipe table and source type. Each row is an NbS sub-practice (suitability family). Each column group is a recipe table it feeds: T4 suitability (where the NbS can establish), T3 hazard links (which climate hazards it mitigates), T6 outcomes & costing. Each group splits into four source channels — Stock (benchmarked stocktake), Lit (updated peer-reviewed), Grey (reports / project docs), Tools (methods / code). So one cell answers: for this sub-practice × table × channel, how far has discovery got, and how much is reviewed?
How to use it. Scan for gaps (what still needs searching, extracting or reviewing). Click a cell's numbers → its evidence units + verify/review state; click its stage pip → the exact search protocol behind it. The Status dropdown above and the Practice / Sub-practice chips filter which rows appear. Key below:
| NbS & Suitability Family Variant ▲ | T4 Suitability Mappings Stock · Lit · Grey · Tools |
T3 Hazard Links Stock · Lit · Grey · Tools |
T6 Outcomes & Costing Stock · Lit · Grey · Tools |
|---|
Search protocol
⚠️ Report missing evidence
Flag a variable / figure / table you expected but that isn't in the register (e.g. "Figure 7 lists slope but there's no slope row"). Logged to the in-repo gaps register (pipeline/metrics/gaps.csv) to feed a re-extraction sweep.
PRISMA-lite Discovery Funnel
Queries & Databases Screened
Discovered and Registered Sources
Tier = source credibility (High / Medium / Low) from the screening rubric (evidence strength · transparency · venue · context · recency).
"Scholar Search" + 0 claims = a source that was logged during search but never registered/extracted (no DOI recorded), so the link falls back to a Google Scholar lookup. These are search candidates, not part of the evidence base yet.
| Source ID | DOI / Link | Tier | Claims | Scope / Context | Extracted Key Variables / Target Hazards | Stage |
|---|
Evidence Claims for Source:
| Evidence ID | Variable | Relationship / Rules | Context | Verbatim Quote / Assertion | Page | Evidence Type |
|---|
Source Metadata JSON
Borderline & Triage Decisions (Human-in-the-Loop Review)
| Decision | Category / Source | Ambiguity / Reasoning | Proposal & Context Boundary Alignment |
|---|
abcdefg